[Met Performance] CID:164940
Boris Godunov {128} Metropolitan Opera House: 02/18/1954.
(Review)
Metropolitan Opera House
February 18, 1954
In English
BORIS GODUNOV {128}
Boris Godunov...........Jerome Hines
Prince Shuisky..........Charles Kullman
Pimen...................Norman Scott
Grigory.................Giulio Gari
Marina..................Blanche Thebom
Rangoni.................Clifford Harvuot
Varlaam.................Lorenzo Alvary
Simpleton...............Paul Franke
Nikitich................Lawrence Davidson
Mitiukha................Algerd Brazis
Woman...................Thelma Votipka
Shchelkalov.............Arthur Budney
Innkeeper...............Martha Lipton
Missail.................James McCracken
Officer.................Osie Hawkins
Xenia...................Genevieve Warner
Feodor..................Margaret Roggero
Nurse...................Jean Madeira
Marina's Companion......Elizabeth Holiday [Last performance]
Marina's Companion......Heidi Krall
Marina's Companion......Maria Leone
Marina's Companion......Sandra Warfield
Lavitsky................Osie Hawkins
Chernikovsky............Lawrence Davidson
Boyar in Attendance.....Gabor Carelli
Conductor...............Fritz Stiedry
Review of Raymond Ericson in Musical America
The first United States-born bass-baritone to appear in the role of Boris Godounoff at the Metropolitan, Jerome Hines, made operatic history in his assumption of that awesome role on Feb. 18. We know that Mr. Hines has thought long and hard about his characterization. He even made a psychiatric study of the mental derangement of Moussorgsky's Tsar with the assistance of physicians (see his own article on the subject in MUSICAL AMERICA, Feb. 1 ).
As a result, his performance was not a capricious pastiche of lay conceptions of progressive insanity, but an authentic portrait of manic depression ending in death by cerebral hemorrhage. Having a set pattern of behavior before him, Mr. Hines was never at a loss as to how to act and one never got the feeling that he was improvising gestures and pieces of business simply for the immediate theatrical effect. The characterization gradually developed symptomatically as the disease itself would and reached its climax with crushing inevitability and finality.
Another result of this approach was that Mr. Hines's Boris was warmer and more human than the austere symbol of maddened conscience we have grown accustomed to. In the scenes with his son, Fyodor, his voice and his whole bearing turned gentle and fatherly and one was reminded that Boris was, after all, a flesh-and-blood being with normal emotional reactions intermingled with the unbalanced ones.
Mr. Hines, I imagine, would be the last to say that his characterization Boris is perfect at this point. Boris is a role that must be lived with for a considerable time and played over and over again until its full depth is plumbed and both have come to ripe maturity. Mr. Hines is still young man and with the magnificent grasp of the part that he now has, he may well go on to become the great Boris of our day. I feel that his voice-one truest, most supple and most beautifully scaled bass-baritones to be heard today-will play an increasingly important
part in this development. He has the tremendous advantage of being able to sing (and I mean really vocalize) all of his music whatever the register. Thus he is free to shape and color the vocal line and bolster some of the great dramatic moments with more vocal intensity than was employed on this occasion. He is fortunate in his diction too, for virtually every word was intelligible. This was rather a mixed blessing, however, since it made all too clear the unlovely and undistinguished English translation.
The rest of the cast, headed by the splendid Shuisky of Charles Kullman, was the same as before, and Fritz Stiedry again conducted.